#Happiness never appeared to me as an absolute aim meaning full#

As always, there’s much more in the full podcast, so subscribe to Vox Conversations on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Stitcher, or wherever you listen to podcasts. We talk about the role of suffering in human life, the shortcomings of hedonism, and why he would never plug into the Matrix.īelow is an excerpt from our conversation, edited for length and clarity. I reached out to Bloom for the latest episode of Vox Conversations. The book isn’t pro-suffering, and Bloom is very careful to distinguish “chosen” suffering from “unchosen” suffering, but it is an attempt to explain why we sometimes seek out hardship and struggle, and why the conventional image of humans as purely pleasure-seeking and pain-avoiding isn’t so much wrong as incomplete. It’s a deep dive into the relationship between suffering and meaning, and why living a purposeful life means caring about much more than happiness. So he asks his guide if he can go to hell instead, and that’s when he learns he’s already there.Ī new book by the psychologist Paul Bloom, called The Sweet Spot, says this story captures the strangeness of human psychology about as well as anything can. But then he grows bored and aimless and starts to hate it.

He has all the sex and money and power he wants. It’s about a gangster who dies and wakes up in a place that has all the markings of heaven - or at least what a guy like that would imagine as heaven.

I just watched an episode of The Twilight Zone that explores this in a way only that show could. Notice that I used the word “good” and not “happy.” It doesn’t make any sense to ask whether we can suffer and be happy at the same time, but can we live a full and meaningful life without certain kinds of suffering? That’s a much harder question. Can we live a good life without suffering?